{"id":651,"date":"2025-10-16T11:21:05","date_gmt":"2025-10-16T11:21:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/2fink.com\/?p=651"},"modified":"2026-09-08T12:42:50","modified_gmt":"2026-09-08T12:42:50","slug":"whatsapp-in-gemeinnuetzigen-initiativen","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/2fink.com\/en\/whatsapp-in-gemeinnuetzigen-initiativen\/","title":{"rendered":"

WhatsApp in non-profit initiatives<\/p>"},"content":{"rendered":"

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

When good intention meets data protection law<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

WhatsApp is the standard tool for coordination in many associations, initiatives and volunteer projects; whether in scheduling, organising actions or communicating with members. This applies in Germany as well as in other European countries. As soon as this communication takes on an organizational character, the GDPR will take effect, regardless of how good the intention behind it is.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t

Between Everyday Life and Law<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Data protection law has one exception, the so-called budget privilege. It only applies as long as communication remains exclusively private. As soon as an association, initiative or organization uses WhatsApp for coordination, this exception is no longer applicable.<\/p>\n

A case from Thuringia shows this clearly: An in-house WhatsApp group, which was also used privately, fell completely under the GDPR. The case is in 5. Activity report<\/a> (external link<\/em>) on the GDPR of the Thuringian State Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information (TLfDI).<\/p>\n

German clubs are now comparatively well informed about data protection risks, including through guidelines from state sports associations. In other European countries, awareness is often less pronounced ? In some cases, advice takes place there only after the competent supervisory authority has already taken action. This gap is an important reason why many initiatives put the issue on the agenda too late.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t

The underestimated technical risk<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

In order to be able to use WhatsApp sensibly, the app requires access to the entire address book. This will automatically share names and phone numbers. Even people who don't know about it and have never agreed to it.<\/p>\n

For initiatives with many volunteers, this is a silent risk. Every new person automatically brings foreign contact data without noticing it. This applies not only to the new person himself, but to every contact in his address book.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t

This is how you approach the topic practically<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

If WhatsApp is used ? and there are often good, pragmatic reasons for this ?, this should be done consciously and transparently:<\/p>\n